What do journalists have to watch out for when they let robots write their articles?

While using robots to write articles can help journalists in terms of efficiency and speed, there are several considerations that they need to be aware of:

1. Lack of nuance and context: Robots can struggle to understand the nuances and context of a story, and may not be able to recognize when a story requires a more in-depth or sensitive approach. As a result, journalists need to be cautious when using robots to write stories that require a human touch.
2. Risk of errors: Robots can make mistakes, especially if they are not programmed correctly or if they encounter unexpected data. Journalists need to be aware of this risk and ensure that they review robot-generated content carefully before publishing it.
3. Plagiarism concerns: Robots can generate content that is similar to existing content, which can raise concerns about plagiarism. Journalists need to ensure that robot-generated content is original and properly sourced.
4. Lack of creativity: Robots can struggle to come up with creative or engaging angles for a story, which can lead to dull or formulaic content. Journalists need to be aware of this limitation and work to ensure that robot-generated content is engaging and interesting.
5. Audience reception: Some readers may be skeptical of robot-generated content and may prefer content that is written by human journalists. Journalists need to be aware of this and work to ensure that their use of robots does not compromise their credibility or reputation.

Overall, while robots can be a valuable tool for journalists, it is important for journalists to be aware of the limitations and potential risks associated with their use, and to use robots as a supplement to their own reporting and writing, rather than a replacement for it.